The Taif Agreement, signed in 1990, brought an end to the Lebanese Civil War, which had raged for 15 years. The agreement was named after the city of Taif in Saudi Arabia, where the negotiations were held.

The main aim of the agreement was to establish a new political system that would put an end to the sectarian divisions that had led to the civil war. The agreement sought to reduce the power of the President, who had traditionally been a Maronite Christian, and to redistribute power among the different religious groups.

Under the agreement, the powers of the President were reduced, and the role of Prime Minister was strengthened. The Prime Minister was to be a Sunni Muslim, while the Speaker of Parliament was to be a Shia Muslim. The President would be a Maronite Christian, but his powers would be limited to a ceremonial role.

The agreement also called for the disarmament of all militias, which had been a major source of conflict during the civil war. This was seen as a crucial step towards establishing a stable and peaceful society.

Despite its aims, the Taif Agreement has faced criticism from some quarters. Some argue that it has not succeeded in ending sectarian divisions in Lebanon, and that political power continues to be distributed along sectarian lines. Others argue that the agreement has simply papered over the cracks without addressing the root causes of the conflict.

Nonetheless, the Taif Agreement remains an important milestone in Lebanese history. It brought an end to a long and bloody civil war, and established a new political order that has allowed Lebanon to rebuild and move forward. While there are still challenges to be overcome, the Taif Agreement remains a symbol of hope for a peaceful and prosperous future for Lebanon.